Newsroom
Press Releases
High-Resolution Photos
Photo Gallery
Video
Contact Us
Calendar
Community Links
Accountability Index
Topics Archive
Talking Points Archive
Take Action Archive
Endorsements
Talking Points
 

It’s Time to Consider the Facts About Crime Cameras
September 7th, 2007 10:11 am

Email Post Link Digg It Add To Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Related at Technorati RSS Feed for post comments.
Share This!

ActLocallySF Gavin Newsom San Francisco camerasBy Gavin Newsom
San Francisco Examiner

Although crime is down in almost every major category in San Francisco, the homicide rate has risen here, as it has in most big cities, to unacceptable levels. To improve public safety, my administration has proposed a number of new initiatives, including a pilot program of placing security cameras in high crime areas.

This technology has been deployed in other U.S. cities and in other countries, and the results vary from very effective to only slightly effective. In the United Kingdom, where the cameras were pioneered, crime dropped dramatically in most of the areas where cameras were used.

Here in the United States, cameras are gaining widespread acceptance, with cities such as Chicago leading the way. Chicago now has more than 2,000 cameras installed, and law enforcement leaders there credit the cameras with helping to lower crime.

This crime-fighting tool has been successfully used in a number of public housing sites. In Boston, where they were part of a pilot project in three public housing projects, they were credited with helping to lower crime by nearly 30 percent at those sites.

Here in San Francisco, we approached this issue thoughtfully, with consideration of privacy issues and community concerns. We are still in a testing phase, but I like the results so far. While we are still learning how to make the most effective use of this new tool, the small number of cameras has already helped in solving a small number of crimes. Based on the evidence, I strongly believe they will also do something much more important than solve crimes — the cameras will help prevent crimes and make neighborhoods safer.

So far, the pilot program is showing some good results. Preliminary analysis of the data shows that crime rates fell in key locations where cameras were placed: 19th and Mission, Eddy and Divisidero, Scott and Eddy, 26th and Treat, and Turk and Scott.

In the grand scheme of our overall budget for safety, the $500,000 we’ve invested in this pilot project is well worth the effort if the cameras bring peace of mind, safer communities and better conviction rates when crimes do occur. That’s why I support extending the crime camera tests to 25 new sites in those areas where neighbors are asking for this tool.

Cameras alone are far from enough. But along with the hiring of new police officers, the increased deployment of beat patrol officers and a sustained emphasis on proven crime-prevention strategies, I believe the cameras will help us continue to lower the crime rate.

  • : 5.5

Email Post Link Digg It Add To Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Related at Technorati RSS Feed for post comments.
Share This!

4 Responses to “It’s Time to Consider the Facts About Crime Cameras”

  1. michael tsang Says:

    Dear Gavin Newsom:
    Ideas to lower homicide rate:
    I have notice through the years alot of non-emergency calls goes unattended it is like we don’t care ,Plus people think that calling 5530123 is a waste of time ,often tragic death start off as a argument,or a stranger wandering around that doesn’t belong there ,so the public image or relation between the police and latin & african american community needs to be patch, so the small argument and stranger can be prevented so it will not esculate into a homicide also the public crack smoker in front of glide church and around the tenderloin and selling is too open it is like the police don’t care,in fact I almost got mugged last week right at the corner of Glide lucky I still got some moves start with these change and if I got any more bright ideas I will email you again.
    Michael Tsang

    • : 1
  2. Jason R Says:

    Cameras would be great if they could actually be viewed live. It’s time to get rid of this notion that there is any “right to privacy” on a PUBLIC STREET.

    THERE IS NO INVASION OF PRIVACY WHEN CAMERAS ARE MONITORED ON PUBLIC STREETS! Until they can be viewed LIVE they are USELESS.

    GAVIN: STOP CAPITULATING TO THE INSANE, POLITICALLY CORRECT EXTREMISTS IN THIS CITY. Come out and SAY that there is no expectation of PRIVACY on PUBLIC streets!!!!! Jesus!

    • : 1
  3. lik roper Says:

    wanna know what’s weird? i’m little brother, and i have surveillance cameras guarding my place of residence…and since installing them, cars are not only slowing down on my street, but the punks have moved on as well - oh, and and by the way; I AM NOT AN AGENT OF THE GOVERNMENT! - www.likroper.com

    • : 10
  4. lik roper Says:

    (and by the way, jason R; i only review footage when absolutely necessary, and that is a very small percentage of the time)

    • : 10

Leave a Comment or Rating


 
You must be logged in to rate or comment!

Email Address:
Password:

 
 
 
 
Register with Actlocallysf.org
 
 

 
You must be logged in to rate or comment!

Email Address:
Password:

 
 
 
 
Register with Actlocallysf.org
 
Welcome to the Talking Points Blog! There's a lot to talk about when it comes to ideas to improve our city. Check out what we're saying and add your comments to the debate!
Firms Adjust to Health-Care Law (5/5)
Newsom Tells U.S. Census it Missed 100,000 People in SF (4/1)
Same-Sex Union -- It's Personal (3/9)
Don't Get Fooled Again (3/6)
San Francisco Ranked 2nd Greenest City In U.S. (2/26)
Top U.S. Court Backs S.F. Health Care (2/23)
Newsom Stresses Diversity in Speech (1/10)
Newsom Takes Oath - Promises Homeless Shelter Reform, Help for Parents of Schoolchildren (1/9)
Newsom Focusing Second Term on Homelessness (1/8)
The California Healthcare Mess - Getting It Right Versus Getting It Done (12/19)
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
311
affordable housing
after school
aids
alchol abuse
bay bridge
bikes
board of supervisors
bottled water
brt
budget
budgets
bus rapid transit
business
cameras
cars
census
chinatown
chronic inebriation
city hall
city survey
civic center
community court
community justice center
crime
dpw
drugs
education
elections
energy
environment
free wifi
gay marriage
geary blvd
global warming
golden gate park
graffiti
green
gun shows
gun violence
guns
health care
healthcare
healthy san francisco
heath care
homeless
homelessness
hospitals
housing
jobs
kids
libraries
marriage equality
muni
muni drivers
nyc
oil spill
panhandling
parking
parking meter
parking meters
parks
pet peeves
plastic bottles
police
pollution
population
potholes
public shools
public transportation
quality of life
safety
schools
sfpd
sidewalks
sidewalksviolence
streets
students
sutter st
t third
teachers
technology
tenderloin
tep
tourism
traffic
transit effectiveness project
trash
trees
uncategorized
unemployment
union square
universal healthcare
unviersal healthcare
van ness ave
violence
vote
water
water bottle
wifi

Paid for Newsom for Mayor. FPPC ID #1290430. © Gavin Newsom for Mayor 2007. All rights reserved.