Newsroom
Press Releases
High-Resolution Photos
Photo Gallery
Video
Contact Us
Calendar
Community Links
Accountability Index
Topics Archive
Talking Points Archive
Take Action Archive
Endorsements
Topic
 

How States Are Driving Cuts in Global Warming Pollution
June 19th, 2007 6:23 am

Email Post Link Digg It Add To Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Related at Technorati RSS Feed for post comments.
Share This!

Clean Cars Program Gavin Newsom San Francisco ActLocallySFBy Elizabeth Ridlington, Policy Analyst, Frontier Group 
Rob Sargent, Energy Program Director, Environment California

GLOBAL WARMING: A THREAT NOT TO BE IGNORED
Human activities—particularly the burning of fossil fuels—have changed the composition of the atmosphere in ways that threaten dramatic alteration of the global climate. The first signs of warming are evident worldwide and additional changes will have serious impacts on our nation’s future.

Temperatures are rising, with 2006 the second hottest year on record in the United States [1]. Worldwide, 11 of the years from 1995 to 2006 to rank among the 12 warmest years on record. Sea level has risen 6.7 inches in the past century [2]. The number of Category 4 and Category 5 hurricanes has increased substantially worldwide over the last 35 years [3].

Future temperature increases and changes in precipitation patterns are expected to alter the distribution of plants and change crop productivity [4]. Higher sea levels may flood coastal areas, especially in Gulf Coast and South Atlantic states, causing property damage, eroding beaches and raising the salinity of drinking water supplies. Stronger storms may cause increased flooding on rivers and streams. Public health may suffer as heat-related deaths rise and insectborne diseases spread.

As the Bush administration has continued to resist meaningful measures to reduce global warming pollution, individual states have taken action, adopting a variety of measures to curb global warming pollution. Among the most effective of these policies are the vehicle global warming emission standards designed by the state of California and since adopted by 11 other states.

THE CLEAN CARS PROGRAM: REDUCING GLOBAL WARMING EMISSIONS
The Clean Air Act allows states with air quality problems to choose between federal vehicle emission standards and the more protective standards—known as the Clean Cars Program—implemented by the state of California.

Unlike current federal standards, the Clean Cars Program includes limits on global warming pollution. Beginning in model year 2009, the program will require automakers to reduce the average amount of global warming pollution from their cars, light trucks and SUVs. By 2015, new cars will be required to emit 34 percent less global warming pollution on average, and light trucks 25 percent less pollution [5]. These aggressive, yet achievable standards will result in significant reductions in global warming pollution.

To date, 12 states—California, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington—have adopted the Clean Cars Program.

We tallied the benefits of the Clean Cars Program in those states as reported in state-specific analyses compiled by three different organizations: the California Air Resources Board, the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), and U.S. PIRG Education Fund. Each report provided enough data to allow us to calculate emissions from light-duty vehicles with and without the Clean Cars Program (Table 1).

Light-duty vehicles in these 12 states are projected to release 443 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (MMTCO2) in 2020, the result of increasing vehicle travel, growing use of SUVs and light trucks, and stagnant fuel economy. By adopting the Clean Cars Program, annual emissions will be reduced by an average of 17 percent, to 369 MMTCO2 in 2020 (Table 1).

By 2020, vehicles in these 12 states will release 74 million metric tons of carbon dioxide less pollution as a result of the Clean Cars Program. Cumulative emission reductions from the inception of the program through 2020 are even greater, totaling 392 MMTCO2 [6].

Table 1

* Lower percentage reductions for Maryland, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Washington are likely the result of methodological differences in the studies used to estimate the reductions, not reduced effectiveness of the program in those states. The analysis for these four states assumes that even without the Clean Cars Program, per-mile global warming pollution from vehicles will decline, thus reducing the relative benefit of the program.

What Is the Clean Cars Program?

The Clean Cars Program is a series of air pollution standards adopted by the state of California. The Clean Air Act allows other states with serious air pollution problems to adopt the standards as well. There are three components to the program:

The Low-Emission Vehicle program, which sets strong standards for emissions of smog-forming and toxic air pollutants.

The Zero-Emission Vehicle program, which promotes advanced-technology vehicles such as hybrids, fuel-cell vehicles and electric vehicles.

Global Warming Emission Standards, which limit emissions of pollutants that contribute to global warming.

The combined global warming pollution reduction from the 12 states that have adopted the program is significant on a global scale.

The annual savings projected for 2020 are greater the national global warming emissions from Austria and 170 other countries today [8]. (See Figure 1)

The cumulative global warming emission reduction from the program between 2009 and 2020 is equivalent to taking 74 million of today’s cars off the road for an entire year [9].

The emission reductions in 2020 are equal to a 6.6 percent reduction in current national emissions from transportation gasoline use [10].

Figure 1

Six more states—Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Hampshire, New Mexico and North Carolina—are actively considering adopting the Clean Cars Program. If those six states adopt the program, the total global warming pollution reduction from having cleaner vehicles on the road would grow to 100 million metric tons of carbon dioxide per year in 2020 (Table 2). Estimated global warming pollution reductions in these states come from two analyses: work done by the Center for Climate Strategies and Environment California Research & Policy Center.

Table 2
Figure 2


THE CLEAN CARS PROGRAM: SAVING ENERGY AND SAVING MONEY
The Clean Cars Program has great potential to reduce U.S. petroleum consumption and save money for consumers. Automakers can use a variety of technologies to meet the standards, including technologies to reduce gasoline use, allow for the use of low-carbon vehicle fuels, or reduce global warming emissions from air conditioning.

Depending on how automakers choose to comply with the standards, the Clean Cars Program in 12 states could lead to a reduction in gasoline use of as much as 8.3 billion gallons annually in 2020—or more than one-fifth as much oil as we currently import from the Persian Gulf [13]. Put another way, the standards would save as much fuel as if all drivers in America parked their cars for 22 days out of the year or if 14 million of today’s cars were taken off the road [14]. This is more gasoline than is currently used by any single state in a year except Florida, Texas, and California [15].

If 18 states adopt the program, gasoline consumption would decline by 11.2 billion gallons, or nearly enough gasoline to provide fuel to all the drivers in Texas for a year.

Reduced gasoline consumption could also translate into consumer savings at the pump. At today’s average fuel prices ($3.10 per gallon), consumers could save up to $25.8 billion at the pump in 2020 [16]. These savings would more than offset the additional cost of vehicles complying with the program. The state of California projects that vehicle owners will save a total of $41 to $81 each year due to the standards—and that is assuming gasoline costs only $1.74 per gallon [17].

STATES MUST BE FREE TO ACT
States’ freedom to adopt California air emission standards has led to cleaner air and technological advances that have benefited all Americans. The federal government should not interfere with their progress and should grant California’s request for a Clean Air Act waiver so that the states can implement the Clean Cars Program.

The 12 states that have adopted the Clean Cars Program have taken leadership in reducing America’s contribution to global warming. The federal government should follow their lead by limiting global warming pollution from cars, power plants, and factories and taking other steps to reduce global warming pollution, save energy, and save consumers money at the pump.

- - - - -

Rob Sargent oversees policy and strategy development for State PIRGs and environmental groups, energy and climate campaigns throughout the U.S. He has been involved as a strategist in numerous successful campaigns including the Massachusetts, California, New Mexico, and New Jersey Renewable Portfolio Standards; the adoption of the California Automobile Emission Standards (LEV/ZEV) programs in the Northeast; and in shaping state and regional climate change action plans.  He was a leader in the successful effort in Massachusetts to secure the first-in-the-nation policy to regulate carbon dioxide power plants, and currently serves as an advisor to the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, working to shape a cap on global warming emissions from power plants in the Northeast.

Elizabeth Ridlington is a policy analyst for the Frontier Group.

Note: Articles are posted for the purpose of generating ideas and honest debate on how San Francisco can live up to its full promise and potential. Posting of an article does not imply an endorsement by the author of Gavin Newsom for Mayor, nor an endorsement by Gavin Newsom for Mayor of the positions set forth in the article.

  • : 5.5

Email Post Link Digg It Add To Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Related at Technorati RSS Feed for post comments.
Share This!

2 Responses to “How States Are Driving Cuts in Global Warming Pollution”

  1. lik roper Says:

    STOP GLOBAL WARMING! ~ BE COOL! -
    www.likroper.com

    • : 10
  2. Sean Smith Says:

    Quoting the article:

    “The first signs of warming are evident worldwide and additional changes will have serious impacts on our nation’s future.”

    Impacts? No…. Have a serious EFFECT? YES!

    • : 1

Leave a Comment or Rating


 
You must be logged in to rate or comment!

Email Address:
Password:

 
 
 
 
Register with Actlocallysf.org
 
 

 
You must be logged in to rate or comment!

Email Address:
Password:

 
 
 
 
Register with Actlocallysf.org
 
Welcome to the Topic Blog! Experts and community leaders are writing about the issues that drive public policy in San Francisco. Post your comments and join the debate!
Retail Chains Starting To Put Out Smokes (5/11)
A City Committed to Recycling Is Ready for More (5/6)
734 businesses sign up for S.F. health program (5/4)
San Francisco Wants to Make Your Recycle (4/30)
San Francisco's Eco-Evolution (3/30)
S.F. Aims for Greenest Building Codes in U.S. (3/25)
The Marrying Man (3/15)
S.F. To Use Only 100% Recycled Paper (3/9)
Newsom Urges Push for Hybrid Plug-In Cars (2/23)
Maria Shriver applauds SF program, expands statewide (2/14)
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2007 election
49ers
affordable housing
anti war
art
ballot
banks
bayview
bayview hunters point
board of education
board of supervisors
bottled water
brt
budget
business
california primary
car break ins
china
cigarettes
city hall
community court
computers
crime
crocker amazon
development
dpw
drugs
earthlink
education
elderly
energy
enivronment
environment
excelsior
food
footnotes
gay marriage
geary blvd
george bush
giants
global warming
google
green
greenhouse gas emissions
hayes valley
health care
health clinics
health insurance
healthcare
homeless
homelessness
hope sf
hospitals
housing
hydra mendoza
illegal immigration
immigration
immigtration
inmates
iraq
jobs
kids
laptops
light bulbs
long term care
market st
marriage equality
medicare
mental health
mission
muni
national guard
north beach
nursing homes
nyc
obesity
ocean view
outer mission
panhandling
parking
parks
parole
plas
plastic bags
police
pollution
powell st
prisons
public schools
public transportation
quality of life
real estate market
recycing
recycling
rental aparments
safety
seniors
sfgh
sidewalks
slow food
smoking
soda
solar
street
streets
students
subprime mortgages
suburbs
sunnydale
tax credits
tax revenues
taxes
technology
tenderloin
the richmond
tourism
traffic
traffic accidents
transportation
trash
trees
uncategorized
union square
universal healthcare
urban planning
violence
walkable urbanism
water
wifi
youth

Paid for Newsom for Mayor. FPPC ID #1290430. © Gavin Newsom for Mayor 2007. All rights reserved.