Newsroom
Press Releases
High-Resolution Photos
Photo Gallery
Video
Contact Us
Calendar
Community Links
Accountability Index
Topics Archive
Talking Points Archive
Take Action Archive
Endorsements
Topic
 

The Real Cost of Bottled Water
June 25th, 2007 2:28 pm

Email Post Link Digg It Add To Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Related at Technorati RSS Feed for post comments.
Share This!

ActLocallySF Gavin Newsom San Francisco bottled waterBy Jared Blumenfeld, Director, SF Department of the Environment
Susan Leal, General Manager, SF Public Utilities Commission
Originally Published in the San Francisco Chronicle

San Franciscans and other Bay Area residents enjoy some of the nation’s highest quality drinking water, with pristine Sierra snowmelt from the Hetch Hetchy reservoir as our primary source. Every year, our water is tested more than 100,000 times to ensure that it meets or exceeds every standard for safe drinking water. And yet we still buy bottled water. Why?

Maybe it’s because we think bottled water is cleaner and somehow better, but that’s not true. The federal standards for tap water are higher than those for bottled water.

The Environmental Law Foundation has sued eight bottlers for using words such as "pure" to market water that contains bacteria, arsenic and chlorine. Bottled water is no bargain either: It costs 240 to 10,000 times more than tap water. For the price of one bottle of Evian, a San Franciscan can receive 1,000 gallons of tap water. Forty percent of bottled water should be labeled bottled tap water because that is exactly what it is. But even that doesn’t dampen the demand.

Clearly, the popularity of bottled water is the result of huge marketing efforts. The global consumption of bottled water reached 41 billion gallons in 2004, up 57 percent in just five years. Even in areas where tap water is clean and safe to drink, such as in San Francisco, demand for bottled water is increasing — producing unnecessary garbage and consuming vast quantities of energy. So what is the real cost of bottled water?

Most of the price of a bottle of water goes for its bottling, packaging, shipping, marketing, retailing and profit. Transporting bottled water by boat, truck and train involves burning massive quantities of fossil fuels. More than 5 trillion gallons of bottled water is shipped internationally each year. Here in San Francisco, we can buy water from Fiji (5,455 miles away) or Norway (5,194 miles away) and many other faraway places to satisfy our demand for the chic and exotic. These are truly the Hummers of our bottled-water generation. As further proof that the bottle is worth more than the water in it, starting in 2007, the state of California will give 5 cents for recycling a small water bottle and 10 cents for a large one.

Just supplying Americans with plastic water bottles for one year consumes more than 47 million gallons of oil, enough to take 100,000 cars off the road and 1 billion pounds of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, according to the Container Recycling Institute. In contrast, San Francisco tap water is distributed through an existing zero-carbon infrastructure: plumbing and gravity. Our water generates clean energy on its way to our tap — powering our streetcars, fire stations, the airport and schools.

More than 1 billion plastic water bottles end up in the California’s trash each year, taking up valuable landfill space, leaking toxic additives, such as phthalates, into the groundwater and taking 1,000 years to biodegrade. That means bottled water may be harming our future water supply.

The rapid growth in the bottled water industry means that water extraction is concentrated in communities where bottling plants are located. This can have a huge strain on the surrounding eco-system. Near Mount Shasta, the world’s largest food company, Nestle, is proposing to extract billions of gallons of spring water, which could have devastating impacts on the McCloud River.

So it is clear that bottled water directly adds to environmental degradation, global warming and a large amount of unnecessary waste and litter. All this for a product that is often inferior to San Francisco’s tap water. Luckily, there are better, less expensive alternatives:

– In the office, use a water dispenser that taps into tap water. The only difference your company will notice is that you’re saving a lot of money.

– At home and in your car, switch to a stainless steel water bottle and use it for the rest of your life knowing that you are drinking some of the nation’s best water and making the planet a better place.

Take the pledge —

Signing on to sfenvironment.org or sfwater.org to register not to buy bottled water for a year enters your name in a drawing to win a free stainless steel water bottle.

- - - - -
Jared Blumenfeld is the director of the San Francisco Department of the Environment. Susan Leal is the general manager of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission.

Note: Articles are posted for the purpose of generating ideas and honest debate on how San Francisco can live up to its full promise and potential. Posting of an article does not imply an endorsement by the author of Gavin Newsom for Mayor, nor an endorsement by Gavin Newsom for Mayor of the positions set forth in the article.

  • : 2.5

Email Post Link Digg It Add To Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Related at Technorati RSS Feed for post comments.
Share This!

6 Responses to “The Real Cost of Bottled Water”

  1. Katie Abate Says:

    It’s nice to have a eco-friendly, eco-conscious Mayor. I came across a great non-profit organization, rewarding socially responsible business leaders for their efforts to make the Earth greener. http://www.snv.org/imaginewhatsnext

    • : 1
  2. Sean Smith Says:

    Quoting the article:

    “Nestle, is proposing to extract billions of gallons of spring water, which could have devastating impacts on the McCloud River.”

    Impacts? No… “Effects” Yes!

    • : 1
  3. Nancy Murov Says:

    There is no access to good tasting city water at San Francisco General Hospital where I work. The water fountain water in the hallways tastes like mold. There is no sink or fountain in the employee lounge. Now there will be no bottled water? Your mandate has not solved the problem, it has shifted the problem: it’s an economic burden to the workers who must now buy water elsewhere, and throw the empty bottles in the garbage, a burden to the environment. City water is good water, I agree but we must have access to it if we’re going to use it. Don’t just look at the quality of the water look to see if there is access to it before you leave us without.

    Thanks

    • : 1
  4. lik roper Says:

    CHECK OUT: STEMMING THE TIDE OF TOXIC CHEMICALS @ http://nrdc.org/health/ - www.likroper.com

    • : 10
  5. Henry Noble Says:

    The article is entirely credible except for this quote. Could someone confirm it?
    “For the price of one bottle of Evian, a San Franciscan can receive 1,000 gallons of tap water.”

    Also, I understand that Coca-Cola Dasani and Pepsi’s Aquafina are both tap water. Is that true?

    Thanks!

    • : 1
  6. Kelly Renick Says:

    I live in Ohio and saw this issue raised on our local news and felt I needed to say something. I am very environmentally friendly person, but I happen to have well water as many of my fellow Ohioans do, and our water is simply undrinkable most of the time. Without the miracle of bottled water my children would be forced to drink foul smelling amber colored water. I am scared that the trend of banning bottled water will move east and I will be left high and dry literally!!!

    • : 1

Leave a Comment or Rating


 
You must be logged in to rate or comment!

Email Address:
Password:

 
 
 
 
Register with Actlocallysf.org
 
 

 
You must be logged in to rate or comment!

Email Address:
Password:

 
 
 
 
Register with Actlocallysf.org
 
Welcome to the Topic Blog! Experts and community leaders are writing about the issues that drive public policy in San Francisco. Post your comments and join the debate!
Retail Chains Starting To Put Out Smokes (5/11)
A City Committed to Recycling Is Ready for More (5/6)
734 businesses sign up for S.F. health program (5/4)
San Francisco Wants to Make Your Recycle (4/30)
San Francisco's Eco-Evolution (3/30)
S.F. Aims for Greenest Building Codes in U.S. (3/25)
The Marrying Man (3/15)
S.F. To Use Only 100% Recycled Paper (3/9)
Newsom Urges Push for Hybrid Plug-In Cars (2/23)
Maria Shriver applauds SF program, expands statewide (2/14)
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2007 election
49ers
affordable housing
anti war
art
ballot
banks
bayview
bayview hunters point
board of education
board of supervisors
bottled water
brt
budget
business
california primary
car break ins
china
cigarettes
city hall
community court
computers
crime
crocker amazon
development
dpw
drugs
earthlink
education
elderly
energy
enivronment
environment
excelsior
food
footnotes
gay marriage
geary blvd
george bush
giants
global warming
google
green
greenhouse gas emissions
hayes valley
health care
health clinics
health insurance
healthcare
homeless
homelessness
hope sf
hospitals
housing
hydra mendoza
illegal immigration
immigration
immigtration
inmates
iraq
jobs
kids
laptops
light bulbs
long term care
market st
marriage equality
medicare
mental health
mission
muni
national guard
north beach
nursing homes
nyc
obesity
ocean view
outer mission
panhandling
parking
parks
parole
plas
plastic bags
police
pollution
powell st
prisons
public schools
public transportation
quality of life
real estate market
recycing
recycling
rental aparments
safety
seniors
sfgh
sidewalks
slow food
smoking
soda
solar
street
streets
students
subprime mortgages
suburbs
sunnydale
tax credits
tax revenues
taxes
technology
tenderloin
the richmond
tourism
traffic
traffic accidents
transportation
trash
trees
uncategorized
union square
universal healthcare
urban planning
violence
walkable urbanism
water
wifi
youth

Paid for Newsom for Mayor. FPPC ID #1290430. © Gavin Newsom for Mayor 2007. All rights reserved.