|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Sandra Hernandez, MD and Steve Heilig, MPH
The American health care system is ailing. It is inefficient, expensive, and worst of all, often inhumane. These long-recognized faults are once again receiving serious and widespread attention at the national, state, and local levels. At this point, however, the practical results of current efforts at “healthcare reform” on a broad scale remain to be seen.
San Francisco does not have to wait for broader action to improve healthcare access and quality on the local level. Local efforts have already embodied at least one aspect of true “San Francisco values” - that, as the famous Haight-Ashbury Free Clinics proclaimed exactly 40 years ago – “Healthcare is a right, not a privilege.”
How that “right” is ensured in policy and practice requires a very complex and sustained effort, involving commitments from many sectors and communities. Some examples of San Francisco’s commitment include the new “Healthy San Francisco” program to provide access to the 82,000 uninsured city residents; the already-effected policy of providing coverage to virtually every child in the city and county; the sustaining of our public hospital, San Francisco General Hospital, in a time when such community institutions are increasingly rare; our community and public free clinic network; our city’s unsurpassed innovations in addressing the HIV/AIDS epidemic; and the Declaration by San Francisco voters that our city and county must expand health coverage, with subsequent expansions in access for children, low-income parents, and contractors to government.
None of these efforts have been easy, inexpensive, perfect, or even complete. However, “the perfect is the enemy of the good” when it comes to addressing complex healthcare improvement. With that limitation in mind, we offer the following priority areas wherein our city is already a leader and can continue to improve in the coming years.
COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SERVICES FOR ALL
The new “Healthy San Francisco” program for universal access to care is already being implemented and should continue. As participants in the diverse and inclusive group of representatives from healthcare, business, labor, community advocates, philanthropy, research and other disciplines who developed the plan, we feel that it represents a fair balance of responsibility. The program will provide prevention, primary care, specialty, pharmacy, laboratory, radiology, and other services, providing an affordable alternative to health insurance, with a choice of providers. It takes advantage of a locally developed, not-for-profit State-licensed health plan. As the program gains experience, it will be monitored for quality and efficiency and adjusted as needed. We are aware of concerns and even legal action to stop the program, but the only way such efforts will succeed is with the shared participation of all concerned.
For more information, click here.
SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES
San Francisco is not alone in experiencing a decline in school-based health services in recent decades, even though it has been demonstrated that school-based health services are among the best ways to reach children and teens. Our School District does the best it can with the resources available. However, more health services are needed in our public schools, and we favor a concerted effort to increase the number of school nurses, clinics, and partnerships with community health providers. This includes the ongoing effort to improve the healthy qualities of food provided, and an ongoing need for more confidential, age- and culturally-appropriate services including those for sexuality and drug education.
For more information, click here.
SUPPORT FOR SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL/COMMUNITY CLINICS
As stated, San Francisco General Hospital is one of the most important health-related resources in our city and the surrounding region. It provides the broadest range of quality health services, training for future and practicing health professionals, and research which benefits people everywhere. SFGH is now embarking on an expensive but essential rebuild for the purposes of seismic safety, but this rebuild will benefit San Francisco in many other ways as well. The rebuild needs to be supported via both, private funding and public funding such as bonds issues and other routes.
In addition, San Francisco’s network of public and private community clinics provide essential services to many of our residents. These clinics are an important component of the healthcare safety net and require continued support. We would like to see neighborhood groups around each clinic adopt a clinic and provide support as has occurred with some libraries and other important community resources.
For more information, try this site or this one.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND JUSTICE
San Francisco residents are often exposed to poor air quality, pollution generated from traffic, power plants, industrial sites, and toxic chemicals in consumer products. These environmental hazards disproportionately effect communities of color and low-income neighborhoods and are increasingly being linked to a range of conditions such as asthma, cancer, and birth defects. The aims of environmental health work in San Francisco include reducing the impact of toxins and chemicals such as lead on human health, improving the Bay Area’s air quality and addressing the effects of air pollution on human health.
See this site, or this one to learn more.
IMMIGRANTS AND HEALTH SERVICES
San Francisco has been declared a “sanctuary city” for undocumented immigrants. The highly-charged debate over immigration reform does not change the fact that many immigrants need health services. Many illegal residents fear legal consequences for accessing health services, and delay seeking care, with resulting increases in suffering and costs. Thus we support the provision of nondiscriminatory, confidential health services to all residents of San Francisco regardless of their immigration status; State and Federal funds should be made available for that care without restrictions due to the patient’s legal status as well. We note that many immigrants in fact use less services for multiple reasons and thus the costs of their care is less than widely feared or alleged.
To learn more, try this site or this one.
TOBACCO-FREE SAN FRANCISCO
San Francisco has been something of a leader in the ongoing crucial effort to prevent the health impacts of tobacco, one of the most serious and lethal health hazards of modern times. We banned smoking in restaurants ahead of the rest of the State, and have increased restrictions on smoking in other public places, marketing and sales of tobacco products to minors, and more. The time may have come to take the penultimate logical step and declare San Francisco a “Tobacco-Free City.” The logistical and legal obstacles to this goal would be daunting, but with the right support, a summit meeting or other venue might direct us towards what is possible.
Click here for more information.
SUBSTANCE ABUSE
San Francisco has unfortunately long been known to have high rates of addiction and abuse of drugs such as heroin, methamphetamine, alcohol, and others. Our city adopted a “Treatment on Demand” approach years ago; such an approach requires the availability of quality addiction treatment services. Much progress has been made and more is needed. We suggest that a comprehensive assessment of needs be made with a commitment to filling gaps and further reducing or even eliminating waiting times for drug and alcohol treatment. As an adjunct to this effort, we reiterate full support for still-controversial syringe exchange programs and the approach embodied in Proposition 36, the “treatment before incarceration” approach to arrested drug users. Finally, as a means of funding such efforts and possible other listed in this document, we favor an increase in taxes on alcohol and/or tobacco that would better reflect their true costs to our community.
Learn more by clicking here, here or here.
A COMMUNITY-WIDE FUNDRAISER FOR HEALTH CARE
For decades, San Francisco has presented large and very successful fundraising events for its fine opera and symphony programs, such as the renowned "Black and White Ball." We propose that such a world-class event be presented for the purpose of providing always-needed funds for healthcare services for the most needy citizens of our city. This "Black and Blue" (?) Ball would demonstrate our commitment to the values that make so many of us proud to be San Franciscans.
For more information, try this site.
——
Sandra Hernandez is CEO of The San Francisco Foundation, the community foundation of the Bay Area, former San Francisco director of public health for the City and County of San Francisco, and a practicing clinician at San Francisco General Hospital in the AIDS clinic.
Steve Heilig is a public health epidemiologist and advocate who serves on the staffs of the San Francisco Medical Society, Commonweal, and California Pacific Medical Center and is editor of the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. Affiliations are for identification purposes only and do not imply organizational endorsement of this document.
Note: Articles are posted for the purpose of generating ideas and honest debate on how San Francisco can live up to its full promise and potential. Posting of an article does not imply an endorsement by the author of Gavin Newsom for Mayor, nor an endorsement by Gavin Newsom for Mayor of the positions set forth in the article.
- : 2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|


August 1st, 2007 at 7:05 pm
sounds good to me! - www.likroper.com
August 2nd, 2007 at 9:26 am
Good Morning to All:
Isn’t San Francisco the Greatest City in the World! So many applicable caring system in place. I so much appreciate all the governmental assistances to serve the disenfranchised people. Especially for the children. So many children need health care, education, safe places to live safely, and a place to grow up with caring leaders to be their role models.
Mayor Newsom has inherited a legacy of wonderful caring system. He is still working even harder to provide more services. Of course, this is a country founded on Freedom of Expression and of Choices. As much as he has instituted caring systems, some Freedom to choose has been taken away. Care Not Cash is a great system. Yet, not everyone who is disenfranchised is able to utilize that care.
So, I have seen many disenfranchised people who is not able to stay in shelters or can qualify under the guidelines of Care Not Cash is very much “out in the cold”.
Can we still provide services to the others who are disenfranchised? How about still provide some sort of living vouchers and food vouchers that can be use only for such purposes?
Shelters can be very dangerous. Food and medicine are extremely expansive these days as well. If ones are sick, they are not able to cook for themselves. Especially, there are no kitchens to cook in. Right?!
I and many people are extremely thankful of the efforts that Mayor Newsom et all are working around the clock to pay special attentions to the disenfranchised. I believe, Mayor Newsom surely covers all spectrum of people. Very pro business, looking after the elderlies, providing the first free pre-schools for the ones that can not afforded, creating job opportunities for the construction apprenticeships that by in large give the ones who are in the apprenticeships REAL job opportunities, and so much more.
Let’s get behind Mr. Newsom et all more encouragements. “Ask Not What Your Country Can Do For You.” Who said that? Of course, President John F. Kennedy said that to remind us All that each of us has a responsibility to SERVE THIS GREAT COUNTRY!
Sincerely,
Linda Lu- Nordling
August 6th, 2007 at 11:45 am
I applaud all efforts to offer univeersal heath care to all of our citizens both in the US and San Francisco. Having just seen ‘Sicko’ the point that univeresal healthcare is not only possible but the only sane way to provide care to all of our citizens, has really been hit home.
Thank you.
August 7th, 2007 at 8:20 am
How can you possibly mention a healthy San Francisco without once mentioning mental health??
August 10th, 2007 at 1:19 pm
The mayor is unfortunately supporting his republican allies’ “parking for the neighborhoods” measure which will drastically increase car trips, air pollution, and, ergo, global warming.
He also pulled his support on Muni improvements, and has done nothing to forward the bike plan lawsuit. Of course he uses “Bike to Work Day” as a photo op, but drives a giant SUV. How healthy is that?
August 16th, 2007 at 3:37 pm
Dear Mayor Newsom:
You are so into helping people on the down and out which is a very commendable cause.
As a tax paying middle-upper class citizen, I would like to know what are your plans to help pay for all these wonderful and very causes?
What are your plans to help the Middle Class?
Because when people like me who don’t have the money to pay for taxes or having to pay less taxes because of the lacking of your plans to expand the white-collar middle class tax paying citizens, then there will be no more money to pay for all these wonderful services.
So, please let us know what your plans are to maintain and expand the white-collar tax paying middle class citizens. Afterall, as there are so many people, I heard there are about 200,000+ residences of San Francisco are receiving assistances of various types, which accounts for say out of 800,000+ S.F. residences, that’s about 25% of the people right who might have their services and assistances eliminated because the rest of hard working residences are not able to keep on paying the taxes necessary to support the 25% right.
It is incredibly important that you have plans to go Top-Down not just merely able to provide just above minimum wages to residences who are more than capable yet only is able to make the above minimum wages such as people who are in their 25-35 age range.
How come so many corporations which you mentioned in the recent Town Hall meeting held at Fairmont Elementary School are not chipping in? You introduced the new coming Superintendent of Education for San Francisco, and he informed us that more than 5,000+ students are lost. Where did they go? Into the suburbs right. Well, that represents the shrinking middle class with children. Teachers in San Francisco are not even making ends meet which is another issue that was raised during the 2 hour meeting. That’s another important point. That probably means that teacher who are single who probably will make more working for a suburb school will continue to not be able to afford living in San Francisco and obviously are not making what a “middle class” single individual should be making. I heard that San Francisco is a “training ground” for these teachers, isn’t that sad?
So, as a supporter of you, I really need to know what your effective plans are to encourage the corporations who do business in San Francisco, who benefit from the residences of San Francisco, who come into San Francisco, what are they contributing to the City?
Thank you,
Linda Lu Nordling
September 13th, 2007 at 5:58 pm
I concur.
I am sick of paying for the increasingly down and out which we are attracting like magnets to our city. As a working-class citizen who has crawled to middle class through blood, sweat and tears, I refuse to take ownership to this, particularly other cities’ social problems which are exported here.
Has anyone considered that there is big money involved in San Francisco homelessness and their encouragement to migrate here on one-way tickets? Is Glide Memorial truly a non-profit? How much do the directors get out of this deal?
Thus, the perpetual drain on SAn Franciscans and their tax dollars. The real wealthy wisely, to their credit, know how to circumnavigate this.
Meanwhile, the middle class and small business is slowly being squeezed out and/or disillusioned with the City’s policies. I know I am. I’m moving my small business down the street out of City limits. Too bad my beloved City will lose out on my never-ending fees, payrolls taxes, business taxes, etc. MAybe a large chain store can afford it.
Menawhile, I’ve got 11 employees and their families that rely on the success of my business to survive. I’ve left with no choice but to give these increasingly hostile policies towards small businesses the bird.