May 24th, 2007 7:16 am

By
Prof. Richard Bender, UC Berkeley’s
College of Environmental Design
John Parman, UC Berkeley’s Urban Construction Laboratory
Can we “slow” the growth of San Francisco’s metropolitan region without stopping it? By “slow,” we make reference to the
Slow Food movement and its CittaSlow offshoot, especially in their emphasis on the value and pleasures of regional difference. “Without stopping it” is to acknowledge the projected growth of the region, which we accept. Our title’s “smart” refers to “smart growth”—“livable” is another favored adjective, both endorsing density without always asking what it means in practice. Like the Buddha, we see a middle way between “slow” and “smart” that emphasizes enjoyment and livability. Like the Californians we have both become, we want to have our cake and eat it, too.
Read more »
|
Share This!
Email Link
Add To Favorites
Add To Digg
Add To Del.icio.us
Add To Yahoo
Related at Technorati
|
10 Comments »
May 23rd, 2007 7:50 am

By Lawrence Sylou-Creutz Ojermark
I’d like to put forth an old idea that has been tried and tested the world over: Pedestrian only street closures. It is not a brash or bold idea as far as San Francisco is concerned, being a world-class, transit first, services-based city. It is not an expensive, highly engineered project that would take years to implement. And the benefits are numerous. There are many narrow streets, plied heavily by foot traffic and not overly used or needed during the daytime hours that could be converted to pedestrian only use. Three such examples could be Powell St. from Market St. to Union Square, Grant Ave. running through Chinatown and the last is Jefferson St. through Fisherman’s Wharf. Imagine covering these streets with appropriate landscaping. Red bricks continuing from the cable car turnaround for Powell St., with benches, trees and sidewalk cafes spilling out onto the flow of people walking freely and without fear of the traffic.
Read more »
|
Share This!
Email Link
Add To Favorites
Add To Digg
Add To Del.icio.us
Add To Yahoo
Related at Technorati
|
6 Comments »
May 9th, 2007 7:57 am

By Rob Black
Currently, San Francisco has a stated goal of 5.5 acres of park or open space for every 1,000 residents. This goal represents about half the 10 acres per 1,000 residents recommended by the National Recreation and Park Association. In neighborhoods like the South of Market and the Inner Mission, areas receiving thousands of new housing units, there are only 1.8 acres of parks per 1,000 residents. As new units are built, the proportion of residents to park space continues to decline. If we want these new and existing neighborhoods to thrive, we must plan for and invest in more parks and open space now. If we wait, the costs will be too prohibitive, the neighborhoods too dense, and the opportunity for a greener, healthier community will be lost.
Read more »
|
Share This!
Email Link
Add To Favorites
Add To Digg
Add To Del.icio.us
Add To Yahoo
Related at Technorati
|
3 Comments »
April 9th, 2007 7:53 am

By
Adrienne J. Tissier
San Mateo County Supervisor
San Francisco Examiner
Originally Published April 2, 2007
Unlike the cure for the common cold, solutions to a significant cause of global warming are commonly known. In fact, more than a few middle-schoolers understand that reducing the number of personal automobiles on the road, reducing the length of time such cars are driven, will in-turn reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The solutions to global warming are found in modern urban planning and zoning and three little words: Transit Oriented Development. Build well-designed, affordable housing within walking distance of efficient mass transit, and the air-fouling traffic jams will unclog themselves. Better yet, build well-designed, affordable housing within walking distance of jobs, schools and retail, and car use will plummet.
Read more »
|
Share This!
Email Link
Add To Favorites
Add To Digg
Add To Del.icio.us
Add To Yahoo
Related at Technorati
|
3 Comments »